Sources Indicate That the Bible Was Corrupted When Muhammad Was Included
Sources Indicate That the Bible Was Corrupted When Muhammad Was Included

Satura Apologia Today

Beyond the Satire Note: Is Muhammad in the Bible? Check out this rather extensive Christian examination of that claim. https://answering-islam.org/Gilchrist/muhammad.html

Nicaea – The Council of Nicaea investigated Muslim allegations of corruption in the Bible and found them to be totally valid as soon as Muhammad showed up in the Scriptures.

            “Who the heck is this?” Church father Athanasius exclaimed as he flipped through the Bible. “Could it be? No!!!”

            “We knew the Bible had been corrupted as soon as we saw Muhammad’s name in the book of 2nd Ezekiel.” Jolly old St. Nicholas explained to concerned Muslims. “And we couldn’t allow our Holy Book to be corrupted, so we took Muhammad out of the Bible. You know how it goes.”

            By publishing time, Muhammad had also been found in the books of 4th and 5th Samuel as well as in Paul’s little-known epistle to the Mexicans.

One thought on “Sources Indicate That the Bible Was Corrupted When Muhammad Was Included

  1. Lol @ “Epistle to the Mexicans”!
    Keep it up.

    I like that you’re including the links to supporting articles… even though those are not quite as humorous…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *